Energista

Aggregating Energy Since 2006

US Army Assumption: Natural Gas nonviable in 25 years

US Army Assumption: Natural Gas nonviable in 25 years

Submitted by Noah Kunin on Mon, 2007-03-26 14:09.

According to a recent study contract SOW (scope of work) released by the Department of the Army: (emphasis added)

"Current Army assumption is that Natural Gas may cease to be a viable fuel for the Army within the next 25 years based on price volatility and affordable supply availability.

The study will attempt to predict natural gas supply/demand over the next 25 years, examine possible scenarios of Liquefied Natural Gas imports vs. domestic natural gas and the overall impact on Army installations overall. The Army's total energy use by installations has decreased by 30% since 1985 but has risen the past two years.

I doubt the Army will decide to release the final report but the type of questions asked in the SOW are key to determining natural gas's ability to be the base load fuel of the 21st century.

Submitted by nickmark on Tue, 2007-03-27 09:03.

I can't get the PDF to download, so I haven't read the SOW. I concur, however, that the feasibility of ramping up LNG imports will be pretty key to expanded use of natural gas in the future; AEO 2007 predicts going from 0.6 tcf to 4.5 tcf (2005-2030). If LNG doesn't grow along those lines (for whatever reason), it'd likely make gas a lot more expensive.

Here's the kicker to me, though: While Pacala and Socolow suggest converting baseload coal to baseload gas as one way of obtaining a wedge of avoided emissions, AEO 2007 anticipates a declining use of gas for electric generation (OK, peaking in 2018 or so, and dropping back to about current levels, but still incompatible with obtaining a wedge). Obviously, what gas prices and availability do is going to be critical to the future viability of converting coal plants to gas. Around here, the idea of baseload gas seems a little contradictory to begin with! Short version: I agree; these are pretty critical questions, though they need to be considered in the context of possible carbon constraints that might make coal even less viable.

(Disclosure: I work for a gas utility.)

Submitted by Noah Kunin on Wed, 2007-03-28 09:09.

Great comment Nick!  Thanks!

For those confused by the alphabet soup or new readers:

AEO = Annual Energy Outlook which is published by the EIA (Energy Information Administration) which is itself run by the DOE (Department of Energy).