User login
Navigation
Categories
Recent comments
- Geothermal heat pumps
13 weeks 3 days ago - Now that's what I call mad science!
28 weeks 6 days ago - SimCity Societies sneak-peek
40 weeks 3 days ago - Environmental Blogs
51 weeks 1 day ago - Possible Hazel-Diesel Demo
1 year 3 weeks ago - great commercial :)
1 year 5 weeks ago - Interesting
1 year 11 weeks ago - Bon voyage!
1 year 12 weeks ago - There's an easy solution...
1 year 13 weeks ago - Wal-Mart
1 year 13 weeks ago
Search
Upcoming events
Blogroll
Links
Browse archives
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 |
Syndicate


Thanks for providing the update. I found the Strib article and point 9 of the recommendations particularly instructive.
9. The Final PPA should not be approved, primarily because of its unreasonable cost to Xcel Energy and its ratepayers, the likelihood that its cost will increase, not decrease over time, and because of the other deficienciesidentified in the Findings. While Excelsior Energy and its witnesses have claimed that the PPA cost will become more reasonable in the future, particularly in light of the Project’s environmental benefits, there is not sufficient evidence of that value to overcome the very significant cost difference that exists today.
This would seem to make it difficult for the PUC to decide in favor of the project, but the project's backers have built a lot of political support. I haven't checked to see how the project has fared among the current set of commissioners, but this would be an interesting piece of information. And, there will likely be at least one new commissioner by summer. So, the real political play may be at the Governor's office.